Financial research · Evals and guardrails
Authenticity screening for recorded interviews
Doubtful answers flagged for a person to judge
The problem
Paid research interviews are worth something only if the person answering speaks from real experience. Some answers read as generic, scripted or generated, and reviewers could not listen to every call to find them.
What we built
We built a screening service that reads both the audio and the transcript and flags answers that show signs of being generic, scripted or AI-generated. Each flag carries the timestamp, the reason and a short clip, so a reviewer can go straight to the moment in question. The framing is fixed by design: a flag means elevated risk for a person to review, never a verdict on the speaker.
What changed
- Answers that read as generic, scripted or generated flagged automatically
- Each flag with a timestamp, the reason and a short clip for review
- A person makes every call: a flag signals elevated risk, never a verdict
Have a problem in this shape?
Tell us what you are trying to win. We will map your version of this build in one call.